<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12182/300">
<title>Artykuły w czasopismach naukowych / Journal articles</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12182/300</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12182/1207"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T06:32:28Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12182/1207">
<title>Which Uncertainty Measure is Most Informative? A Time-varying Connectedness Perspective</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12182/1207</link>
<description>Which Uncertainty Measure is Most Informative? A Time-varying Connectedness Perspective
Szafranek, Karol; Rubaszek, Michał; Uddin, Gazi Salah
We investigate the relationship between the three most popular uncertainty measures with the means of the state-of-the-art connectedness frameworks applied to the time-varying parameters vector autoregression model with stochastic volatility. We find marked increases in uncertainty connectedness during major economic turmoil and hostile events. VIX turns out to be the most forward-looking uncertainty measure that persistently&#13;
transmits shocks to the remaining uncertainty proxies at lower frequencies. In turn, GPR, approximating specific information related to geopolitical risk, transmits shocks to other measures at short-term frequencies, while the EPU index is largely replicating unanticipated movements in the VIX or GPR. We also present implications of these findings for economic modelling.
</description>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
